Ethology: the fashion of the mismanagement of the dog's life shattered TG5 I saw now the case of the Child in swaddling clothes, killed by the Neapolitan Mastiff, known race watchdog.
Exactly, WATCHDOG. This word, and any term referring to the attitude of a dog does not seem to have more value or fundamental parameter for gesione dog you have.
I am speechless and saddened, but this case gives me confirmation of: the management of dogs is much worse today than in the 80's, why do not you have multiple dogs, but for what they are anthropomorphized, or based on the concept of a bell jar 'ethological.
"are all equal, all are born as my neighbor's pug, is the owner incompetent or evil that makes the difference, not the dog" This is a quite false assumption that can only lead to rampant mismanagement and poor welfare of the dogs (this is a new
busness?)
The management of a mastiff is not that of a Maltese who is not that of a bloodhound that is not that of a husky and so on. As well as the necessary structures are not the same as the inclinations and ethological needs are not the same.
This does not mean that the mastiff is bad,
means that the Mastiff is a guardian, not a dog as a pet Maltese, is different, and otherwise behaves beyond all the theories that sull'omogeniezzato ethological we have to candy everywhere. The Maltese should be understood as Maltese, Mastiff mastiff as: the strict observance of religious tradzioni and most diverse food, but you are not allowed to respect the diversity of dogs?
A small child's smell and movements (often unconsciously) that talvota wife is ill with the communication with the dogs, so that Aloro react. Should understand this Adut esssere the dog, the dog does not have to decide whether the strange being who is the child is a mnaccia or not.
80 years nobody would have thought to free the guard dog while there are children, especially infants, in the garden, the only protection of an elder. This is because the watchdog is the watchdog and the meaning of this word was neither negative nor taboo, but described the reality of ethological dog and was a sign of deep respect for the dog itself in its integrity. No dog in the 80's would be left alone, just as any child.
today are family dogs in the same way, regardless of the differences as if differences were a taboo that attitude is a total lack of respect for the dog! happen and then these news stories and controversies that reopen to educate us to the same homogenized ethological leading owners to choose the wrong dog and manage it worse!
The response of the institutions? The pug
now the undersecretary reiterated the urgency of patentitini for ALL owners (even Pomeranian) for now optional (underlining for now!)
But
license to learn what??
If the license focuses on the fact that all we can handle everything and that all dogs are alike in needs and management ... well, is the homogenized ethological that for years there syrups and that led to this widespread mismanagement of dogs !
If you are meant to bring awareness to the owners, well-being, culture is never a bad thing.
not to mention the corollary to the basic principle of the homogenized ethology:
"since all dogs are good and equal by nature, ALL WE HAVE EVERYTHING just only have love and space! " slogan is more idiotic?? I would not be able to have either a route or a malinois or a border or even a small terrier.
I I would live with these dogs and they hurt me. matter of feeling, but it seems that dogs can not be said ... why are all the same.
And I add that I would not be able and I would not be a good host for them with or without a license!
homogenization ethological the face (which I rather stodgy!)
:-) :-(